<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bridging Rails to Amazon SimpleDB using ActiveResource</title>
	<link>http://inside.glnetworks.de/2008/01/20/bridging-rails-to-amazon-simpledb-using-activeresource/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 12:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: zeckinger</title>
		<link>http://inside.glnetworks.de/2008/01/20/bridging-rails-to-amazon-simpledb-using-activeresource/#comment-67545</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 14:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://inside.glnetworks.de/2008/01/20/bridging-rails-to-amazon-simpledb-using-activeresource/#comment-67545</guid>
					<description>as of today i am not sure which gem to use and which proxy version to use. there is also an issue with SELECT queries - i outlined this on 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2978356/running-complex-queries-with-amazon-sdb-simpledb-aws-sdb-activeresource&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;stack overflow&lt;/a&gt;

if the sdb-proxy needs a specific version of aws-sdb, why not patch or continue the development? i would be happy to hack some patches in, please let me know on stack overflow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>as of today i am not sure which gem to use and which proxy version to use. there is also an issue with SELECT queries - i outlined this on<br />
<a href="http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2978356/running-complex-queries-with-amazon-sdb-simpledb-aws-sdb-activeresource" rel="nofollow">stack overflow</a></p>
<p>if the sdb-proxy needs a specific version of aws-sdb, why not patch or continue the development? i would be happy to hack some patches in, please let me know on stack overflow.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Martin Rehfeld</title>
		<link>http://inside.glnetworks.de/2008/01/20/bridging-rails-to-amazon-simpledb-using-activeresource/#comment-52648</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 09:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://inside.glnetworks.de/2008/01/20/bridging-rails-to-amazon-simpledb-using-activeresource/#comment-52648</guid>
					<description>@Kelly/#11: Not really, I'm afraid. Think of AWS SDB Proxy more as a proof of concept. aws-sdb 0.1.2 works fine for that purpose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Kelly/#11: Not really, I&#8217;m afraid. Think of AWS SDB Proxy more as a proof of concept. aws-sdb 0.1.2 works fine for that purpose.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Kelly</title>
		<link>http://inside.glnetworks.de/2008/01/20/bridging-rails-to-amazon-simpledb-using-activeresource/#comment-52592</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 21:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://inside.glnetworks.de/2008/01/20/bridging-rails-to-amazon-simpledb-using-activeresource/#comment-52592</guid>
					<description>Do you have any plans to update this plugin to keep it in sync w/ aws-sdb gem?  I get the same error that @dash got.  I'd really rather not roll back to the old gem version.  It looks like there have been a lot of bug fixes since then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you have any plans to update this plugin to keep it in sync w/ aws-sdb gem?  I get the same error that @dash got.  I&#8217;d really rather not roll back to the old gem version.  It looks like there have been a lot of bug fixes since then.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: martin.rehfeld</title>
		<link>http://inside.glnetworks.de/2008/01/20/bridging-rails-to-amazon-simpledb-using-activeresource/#comment-44036</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 18:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://inside.glnetworks.de/2008/01/20/bridging-rails-to-amazon-simpledb-using-activeresource/#comment-44036</guid>
					<description>@dash/#9: This post is fairly old, so it might not be in sync with later developments. Please try to use aws-sdb 0.1.2 instead of the current 0.3.1 and see if it works ok with that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@dash/#9: This post is fairly old, so it might not be in sync with later developments. Please try to use aws-sdb 0.1.2 instead of the current 0.3.1 and see if it works ok with that.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: dash</title>
		<link>http://inside.glnetworks.de/2008/01/20/bridging-rails-to-amazon-simpledb-using-activeresource/#comment-44034</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 17:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://inside.glnetworks.de/2008/01/20/bridging-rails-to-amazon-simpledb-using-activeresource/#comment-44034</guid>
					<description>Hi,

When I try to execute  &quot;rake --trace aws_sdb:create_domain DOMAIN=my_test_domain&quot;, I get the following error:

** Invoke aws_sdb:create_domain (first_time)
** Invoke environment (first_time)
** Execute environment
** Execute aws_sdb:create_domain
rake aborted!
wrong number of arguments (3 for 1)
/Users/dharmesh/NetBeansProjects/FooPetsTranslations/vendor/plugins/aws_sdb_proxy/lib/aws_sdb_proxy/server.rb:27:in `initialize'
/Users/dharmesh/NetBeansProjects/FooPetsTranslations/vendor/plugins/aws_sdb_proxy/lib/aws_sdb_proxy/server.rb:27:in `new'
[...]

Please advise. Thanks in advance!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>When I try to execute  &#8220;rake &#8211;trace aws_sdb:create_domain DOMAIN=my_test_domain&#8221;, I get the following error:</p>
<p>** Invoke aws_sdb:create_domain (first_time)<br />
** Invoke environment (first_time)<br />
** Execute environment<br />
** Execute aws_sdb:create_domain<br />
rake aborted!<br />
wrong number of arguments (3 for 1)<br />
/Users/dharmesh/NetBeansProjects/FooPetsTranslations/vendor/plugins/aws_sdb_proxy/lib/aws_sdb_proxy/server.rb:27:in `initialize&#8217;<br />
/Users/dharmesh/NetBeansProjects/FooPetsTranslations/vendor/plugins/aws_sdb_proxy/lib/aws_sdb_proxy/server.rb:27:in `new&#8217;<br />
[&#8230;]</p>
<p>Please advise. Thanks in advance!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: martin.rehfeld</title>
		<link>http://inside.glnetworks.de/2008/01/20/bridging-rails-to-amazon-simpledb-using-activeresource/#comment-23780</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 19:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://inside.glnetworks.de/2008/01/20/bridging-rails-to-amazon-simpledb-using-activeresource/#comment-23780</guid>
					<description>Tim has just released version 0.1.2 of the aws-sdb gem. As Amazon will discontinue the API version used in version 0.1.1 shortly, a update is highly recommend. 0.1.2 is working great with AWS SDB Proxy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim has just released version 0.1.2 of the aws-sdb gem. As Amazon will discontinue the API version used in version 0.1.1 shortly, a update is highly recommend. 0.1.2 is working great with AWS SDB Proxy.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Josh Adams</title>
		<link>http://inside.glnetworks.de/2008/01/20/bridging-rails-to-amazon-simpledb-using-activeresource/#comment-23652</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 23:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://inside.glnetworks.de/2008/01/20/bridging-rails-to-amazon-simpledb-using-activeresource/#comment-23652</guid>
					<description>Tim,

You know Jamis has decried Needle as unnecessary?  http://weblog.jamisbuck.org/2007/7/29/net-ssh-revisited</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim,</p>
<p>You know Jamis has decried Needle as unnecessary?  <a href='http://weblog.jamisbuck.org/2007/7/29/net-ssh-revisited' rel='nofollow'>http://weblog.jamisbuck.org/2007/7/29/net-ssh-revisited</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: martin.rehfeld</title>
		<link>http://inside.glnetworks.de/2008/01/20/bridging-rails-to-amazon-simpledb-using-activeresource/#comment-23643</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 19:51:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://inside.glnetworks.de/2008/01/20/bridging-rails-to-amazon-simpledb-using-activeresource/#comment-23643</guid>
					<description>@Tim: Just sent you an email with my one-liner ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Tim: Just sent you an email with my one-liner <img src='http://inside.glnetworks.de/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Tim Dysinger</title>
		<link>http://inside.glnetworks.de/2008/01/20/bridging-rails-to-amazon-simpledb-using-activeresource/#comment-23642</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 19:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://inside.glnetworks.de/2008/01/20/bridging-rails-to-amazon-simpledb-using-activeresource/#comment-23642</guid>
					<description>I opened the aws-sdb project up a bit today and added a request for developers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I opened the aws-sdb project up a bit today and added a request for developers.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Tim Dysinger</title>
		<link>http://inside.glnetworks.de/2008/01/20/bridging-rails-to-amazon-simpledb-using-activeresource/#comment-23641</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 19:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://inside.glnetworks.de/2008/01/20/bridging-rails-to-amazon-simpledb-using-activeresource/#comment-23641</guid>
					<description>I purposely kept the API simple (heh no pun intended) so as to not presume how people would want to use SDB.  

Creating Item and Domain objects had crossed my mind but I wanted the initial release to just be access to SDB - not trying to do anything fancy on top yet.

More later.... :)

Heh martin - if you have patches then let's have them!  I still have to do the rdoc and more polish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I purposely kept the API simple (heh no pun intended) so as to not presume how people would want to use SDB.  </p>
<p>Creating Item and Domain objects had crossed my mind but I wanted the initial release to just be access to SDB - not trying to do anything fancy on top yet.</p>
<p>More later&#8230;. <img src='http://inside.glnetworks.de/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Heh martin - if you have patches then let&#8217;s have them!  I still have to do the rdoc and more polish.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
